Search for: "CLARK v. 3M COMPANY"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 4:17 pm
Pella Corporation (Pella windows); Simonian v. 3M Company; Simonian v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:43 pm
From Hoffmann v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
Total costs are expected to come to £3m. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
The global $3m fund is open to news organisations of any size, which have a proven track record in fact-checking and debunking activities or partner with an organisation with such recognition. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm
As part of the settlement, Facebook will donate £3m to Citizens Advice to deliver a new UK Scams Action Project. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Patent landscape analytics may prove you wrong (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Why sinking markets could mean real opportunities for patent acquirers and licensees (IAM) Global - Copyright Copyright still viable, at least for top authors (IP finance) Understanding the backlash cost in copying someone else's work (Techdirt) Africa Designers from all OAPI (Organisation Africaine de la Propriete Intellectuelle) countries to benefit from fee reductions (Afro-IP) (WIPO) WIPO and… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
Swisa: implications for India (Spicy IP) Centre for Science and Environment accused of copyright infringement by Mint's editor (Spicy IP) Delhi High Court dicta on fair dealing increases woes of news channels: ESPN Stars Sports v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (The Invent Blog),Brand promise and IP strategy: (IP ThinkTank),Cybersquatters have reached record numbers, says WIPO: (WIPO), (Ars Technica), (IPKat)Global - PatentsForbes interview with M Meurer (co author of ‘Patent Failure’): (Patent Prospector), (IPBiz),More on Bessen and Meurer and their book ‘Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers put Innovators at Risk’: (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IAM), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property),… [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure… [read post]
